Stop the Bailout or We’ll Pay Dearly!

stop the government bailout of the irresponsible
Congress would like the prudent to pay for the misdeeds of the irresponsible. Of course the cost will show up in your tax bill or the ever shrinking buying power of our dollar. Enough is enough.

Say now or pay later. Visit this website dedicated to stopping the mortgage/real estate bailout. Stop the Mortgage Bailout.

From the website…

This site is dedicated to stopping the government’s planned bailout of the housing market. A bailout requires responsible Americans to pay for the acts of greedy bankers, mortgage brokers, flippers, and over-extended homeowners. In other words, the government wants you to pay for the blunders of others who knew, or should have known, better.

Equally as important, a bailout would permanently price out of the housing market all those responsible Americans who have been patiently saving to buy a house that they can actually afford. The current housing correction is necessary to correct for the historic run up in housing prices over the past decade, which has pushed the price of housing beyond affordability. By bailing out the housing market, the government will prevent housing prices from returning to affordability and thereby ensure that young families will not be able to afford homeownership.

A government bailout of the housing market is both fiscally and morally irresponsible; it is an unfair subsidy being paid to the wealthy (bankers), the greedy (mortgage brokers, flippers, and yes some homeowners), and the incautious (some homeowners), with no benefit to those paying the bill (taypayers).

Why should responsible Americans be forced to pay for the mistakes of others?

They are stealing from us. Let them know we know. United we can stop them.

Finally! The REAL Criminals are Being Targeted

For months the Mortgage Guy has been fighting the flawed perception that those most culpable for the mortgage meltdown are the buyers, realtors and mortgage originators. Conventional wisdom would have you believe they are most and directly responsible for the real estate meltdown and the mortgage crisis.

My contention is that the home buyers, real estate agents and mortgage originators are being wrongly blamed for the mortgage meltdown. Sure they played a part, but I believe their respective responsibilities for the debacle is minimal and leaning toward innocence in nature and intent.

All political and regulatory emphasis to date, has been put on either adding to already burdensome lending regulations or bailing out the “greedy” home buyer. That is until the Securities and Exchange Commission set their sights on the mortgage securitization process. This is where the biggest, most serious and harmful crimes were committed.

A look at this recent Yahoo News article will give you an idea as to what the SEC is concerned with.

The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating how banks, credit rating firms and lenders valued and disclosed complex mortgage-backed securities that ultimately led to the subprime crisis, a top agency enforcer said on Saturday.

The article points out that while the SEC didn’t name the companies involved, Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley have disclosed regulatory investigations pertaining to their role in the credit crisis. In all, there are over thirty firms being looked at. It goes on to say…

Banks, due diligence firms and credit rating agencies are being examined for their role in the securitization process, or how mortgages were sold, repackaged and bundled into special financial products.

The SEC is looking at the valuations and accounting treatments of mortgage-backed securities. It is looking at whether the securities were valued correctly in the first place, what was the level of risk and if that was adequately disclosed to shareholders.

In my opinion, the investment banks, with help from others, committed the fraud of labeling credit standard deficient loans as AAA investment grade paper. By doing so, they were able to feed a huge hunger for safe but uncharacteristically high yielding investments. Feeding this appetite for high yet safe yield, allowed for the spread of this toxic paper all over the world.

The investment banks could not pull off the crime of the century without having ample assistance. This is where the ratings agencies and due diligence firms/departments come into play.

It is up to due diligence entities to properly assess the risk and suitability of investments. Apparently, based on the total destruction of our credit markets, these due diligence “experts” couldn’t see that by mixing a pot of AAA mortgages with a pot of DDD mortgages one cannot expect an investment pool deserving a AAA rating as the end result. This is so even if you take into consideration that they bought “insurance” on the portfolio.

The final gate keeper responsible for safeguarding the investment public from misdeeds such as these, are the credit rating agencies. These so called “independent” firms really have the final say as to the grade of any debt security. Yet they also couldn’t see that an investment portfolio with a major exposure to credit standard deficient mortgages should not be rated AAA in safety.

A reasonable person would wonder why the ratings agencies would implicate themselves in what turns out to be the total destruction of our debt markets. The answer is the same for all involved. Money.

At S&P, for instance, no longer will they hand out triple-A’s to issuers who pay them boatloads of fees. They now will employ an ombudsman to listen to complaints about the agencies handing out triple-A’s to issuers who pay them boatloads of fees.

What if General Motors built cars that didn’t run, or your local dairy produced sour milk? What if your bank said it didn’t deposit your paycheck because it lost it, or the electric company just quit supplying your neighborhood?

Then, in response to it all, those companies said: good news, we’re hiring an ombudsman. The ratings agencies in the same fashion have failed on their intrinsic purpose: to judge the likelihood that a debt will default. As of Tuesday they’re about 0 for a few billion.

The quote is from an excellent MarketWatch article that gives insight into the role the ratings agencies played in the destruction of our credit markets. I owe a huge hat tip to The Common Sense Forecaster for bringing my attention to it.

It’s important to realize that events leading to the mortgage meltdown occurred on a “top down” basis. Buyers cannot buy from realtors unless mortgage originators have the loan programs to fit the buyer’s profile. The mortgage originators cannot offer loan programs unless lenders are providing them. The lenders will not provide loan programs unless the securitizers can turn the mortgages into marketable securities and the ratings agencies have the final say as to the grade (the likelihood of default) of those securities.

Proof for this observation is the current state of the mortgage industry. Despite the current demand, no longer are 100% financing for credit damaged borrowers and stated income and asset programs available. This is because lenders cannot securitize these types of loans. They cannot securitize these loans because it has become painfully apparent to investors that these once called AAA investments are nothing of the sort.

Also evidenced by the current state of the mortgage industry, is that without the securitization of mortgages, no one lends and thus, no one buys real estate or borrows money against their house. This makes it clear that it is the securitization engine that drives the entire mortgage process and in turn the real estate markets.

The demand still exists for 100% financing, no income, no asset loans and subprime/alt A loans in general. Being that these programs are no longer available, makes clear that the mortgage business is not driven from the bottom up. The demand is still there, yet it goes unanswered because the securitizers cannot sell the mortgage backed securities. The business is indeed driven by top down forces.

Realizing that the mortgage industry runs on securitization, it’s plain to see who the real criminals are in the mortgage crisis. It is clearly the securitizers, due diligence firms and ratings agencies. They are the major force behind the mortgage industry and it’s destruction.

Without the securitizers lying about the credit quality of the subprime mortgages being securitized, and the winks and the nods from the due diligence firms and ratings agencies, the securitizers could have never sold anywhere near the amount of toxic debt that has been polluting investment portfolios and economies around the world.

The fraud committed by these criminals created the immense capital that led buyers and originators to use the unsuitable mortgage products that have led us into this world wide crisis. They enabled the lenders, originators, realtors and buyers in committing their misdeeds which have led to the total seizing of our credit markets. This in turn has thrust our economy into recession and potentially much worse.

Now it should be clear to all, the buyer, realtor and originators were simply responding to demand that was met by capital that was fraudulently raised. All the buyers wanted was a piece of the “American Dream”. Realtors sought to help them get it and the originators were empowered to provide the financing by the capital raised through fraudulent means.

These subprime/alt A, toxic loan programs simply appeared on our rate sheets. The guidelines specifically allowed for damaged credit, no down payments, no proof of income, assets and in some cases no proof of having a job. There was no fraud involved because the product guidelines allowed for these aspects specifically.

Originators who realized these types of loans were time bombs waiting to explode, could not refuse to sell them. If they did, the consumer would just go to another originator offering these programs. Believe me, there were many originators who saw the writing on the wall two to three years ago. Yet we were powerless to do anything about it. It wasn’t our money being lent, thus we had no say and market forces worked against dissent.

It’s time to end the mis-perception that it was the greed of buyers, realtors and originators that led us into the subprime/credit crisis. Yes to a degree this element played a part in the dilemma but this is not the real cause of the meltdown. It was the titanic greed of the securitizers and their “assistants” that fraudulently created the capital and market forces that have led us to the historic break down of our credit markets and economy.

The first step in restoring confidence in the debt markets shouldn’t be bailouts for the investment banks and insurers. Nor should it be bailing out homeowners through rendering legal contracts as useless. The healing will begin when the real criminals are outed and the perp walks proceed down Wall Street.

Then the world will know our markets are governed by the rule of law, one set of laws for all and no one above the law, as opposed to political cronyism. The perception of political and regulatory cronyism will undoubtedly taint our securities markets forever. This will further weaken the United States’ ability to be a world class economic player.

Blog Banter on Refinancing Now and Placing Blame

As I surf the blogosphere, I occasionally come across misconceptions that just need to be addressed. I had to respond to a post made on an article on MarketWatch’s site pertaining to the upturn in refinance activity.

Here is the comment I responded to…

by BobP863 2 hours ago

The obvious question is why not wait till the FED is through lowering interest rates? Unless there are no closing costs, i don’t understand the urgency. Unless, of course, those irresponsible mortgage lenders are desperate and have to oversell their products in order to survive.

Apparently in need of some guidance, I responded…

While you are waiting for the fed to finish lowering rates, house values are declining. Lack of adequate home value can make refinancing more expensive (pmi) or in some cases, not possible at all.

Further, lending guidelines are being tightened everyday. You can qualify yesterday and may not be qualified today.

The fed doesn’t control mortgage rates. Further deterioration in the Mortgage Backed Securities market could widen the spread between treasuries and mortgage rates. It’s possible to see treasuries move down in yield and mortgages move up in yield, especially in the current environment.

These are reasons for urgency. Maybe now you can understand. But I doubt you will ever understand that it’s not just a subprime issue anymore and that the most blame for the debacle is to be placed on Wall Street and the ratings agencies.

They (Wall Street) enabled every player in the chain. Without Wall Street lying about credit quality and spreading their fraudent securities around the world, we wouldn’t be in this mess. The lenders would not have lent and the buyers would not have bought unaffordable homes.

Happy New Year?

Due to the holidays, year end house cleaning and illness, I haven’t posted in a couple of weeks. Well the new year is here and having taken care of the above issues, I am back to posting.

The question mark in the post title is no accident. This will be, without a doubt, the most challenging year we have ever faced in the mortgage industry. Will it be happy? Only time will tell.

The mortgage industry continues to shrink with the lender implode list reaching 210. Subprime product offerings remain slim. Essentially, there is no subprime as we once knew it. I have clients and friends that I cannot help due to products being discontinued. It literally keeps me up at night, knowing that a year ago, their problems would be solved but now they will only get worse and there is nothing I can do about it.

Alt A isn’t much better. The jumbo price spreads remain unusually large and product offerings in this class of loans are shrinking like the subprime offerings.

That leaves conventional loans. Fannie and Freddie pricing is pretty attractive right now. However, underwriting in this class of loans has tightened significantly as well. We are not an FHA shop so I won’t address that market other than to say, it’s not a panacea for the ills the industry faces, not that anyone said it was.

Let’s not forget that mortgage lending is collateral based. The collateral being real estate, the value of which is plummeting at record paces. Without adequate collateral, mortgages cannot be made. I don’t know how far real estate prices will fall but I can tell you this. Until the mortgage industry is repaired, values will decline in a historic manner.

In order for this year to be good for the mortgage industry, the process of securitizing mortgages must be repaired. The mortgage industry cannot survive without it. Real estate prices will need firm up as well. However as long as the mortgage industry is broken, that will not happen.

Another ingredient for a good year is for our government leaders to get a clue about what is going on and how to deal with it. Every government action to date clearly miss the marks needed to turn the situation around. Their so called solutions reveal their total lack of understanding of the situation at hand. It’s all show. “I care so re-elect me.” Meanwhile their actions will shrink an already devastated industry making consumer choices fewer and more expensive. It’s good thing they care.

Let me just say that when I started this blog it wasn’t my intention to become a gloom and doomer. That isn’t my nature. I am and always have been a “can do”, optimistic guy. But I am foremost a realist. I accept reality at face value in order to deal with it efficiently. The reason for the negativity in this blog is because in reality, we are faced with a very negative outlook.

There’s more to come. So let’s work at making 2008 a happy year. Good luck, we are all going to need it.

Eye Opener: Current Mortgage Defaults Not Due to ARM Resets

When will America awaken to the pending economic crisis?The political, business and media elite will have you believe that the current historic mortgage default rate is due to adjustable rate mortgage payment/interest rate resets.

Consequently all three entities are pushing for socialistic remedies. These so called remedies will only worsen the problem by obliterating what is left of the mortgage industry.

Iamfacingforeclosure dot com posts a very interesting article that points out current mortgage defaults are not solely due to ARM resets. Not yet anyway… The emphasis is mine.

The national foreclosure rate has climbed steadily throughout 2007. While most reports attribute the bulk of the foreclosures to ARM resets, the reality is that more than half of the borrowers who are defaulting are still in their first year of the loan.

The abysmal failure of Credit Ratings Agencies and risk management departments of financial institutions to properly assess the risk aspects of subprime loans, have allowed for loan underwriting so lax that borrowers are defaulting on the low teaser rate payments. You can just imagine what will happen next year when mortgage payments rise by an average thirty three percent.

Bank of America Securities estimates that rates will reset on $362 billion worth of adjustable rate subprime mortgages in 2008. At the same time, resets will also occur on $152 billion worth of other loans with adjustable rates, such as Alt-A loans and jumbo loans (loans over $417,000).

The article is a good read and I encourage you to check it out.

As with many, if not all important issues facing the country and it’s middle class today, the mainstream media and our politicians cannot be looked to as reliant information sources. Every tid bit of information disseminated by these self serving entitities is slanted with some type of agenda.

Their tactics include lies, half truths and outright omission. Perhaps that is why the general public is totally oblivious to the economic crisis unfolding before our very eyes.

Staying Current With The Mortgage/Real Estate/Economic Crisis of 2007

Below are selected news headlines that will bring you up to speed on the mortgage industry and the effects it is having on the overall economy. Basically the mortgage industry is broken. Wall Street will not buy mortgage securities so lenders aren’t meeting the demand for loans. Only the most credit worthy are able to borrow on favorable terms.

This is causing three major problems. One is nationwide real estate values are plummeting at a historical rate. The second problem is that homeowner’s ability to borrow has been greatly diminished and could disappear all together. The third problem is that lenders are not able to securitize their mortgages.

If they can’t securitize they won’t lend. Also due to the massive depreciation in the values of their mortgage security holdings, the lenders themselves are in jeopardy of going out of business.

If the consumer cannot borrow, the consumer will not spend money to keep the economy growing. Consequently, there are more and more predictions for a recession in 2008. The effects of the mortgage and real estate crisis on the economy are just beginning to be felt. In fact we’re in the very early stages of this economic meltdown.

In any event, here are some articles to support these views.

Articles pertaining to the subprime situation

Effects On The Economy

The Big “A” Paper Lenders Take Big Hits, It’s Spreading…

Would The Government Bailout Renters?

Mortage and real estate meltdowns feed off each other.There is a grand standing rush for our political leaders to act like they are doing something about the mortgage crisis. Much of what I have seen in the way of proposed legislation and initiatives fall far short in solving the problems. In fact, I see them causing more harm than good.

Our media and politicians are crying out for some type of home owner bailout. In fact, there are initiatives already under way. Massive amounts of taxpayer money are being earmarked for bailout funds and education/counseling.

This brings me to my question. Would the government do the same if these home owners were renters? Would they setup rent assistance funds and allot taxpayer money for the purpose of educating and counseling people who rent their dwellings?

A recent Market Watch article provided this characteristic of first time buyers…

But consider this: 45% of first-time buyers bought with no money down, and the median down payment of a first-time buyer was 2%.

Is there a difference between a home owner who has zero equity and never put any equity into a house and a renter who also has zero equity in their dwelling? From a personal balance sheet perspective, there isn’t. At least not to the net worth bottom line.

I don’t think there is a difference and that is why I question initiatives to assist this particular group of home owners in trouble. Lacking any differences, why do these people get special treatment over renters?

The government and media need to realize that not only is it impossible, but it is a waste of time and money to try to legislate…

  • A minimal amount of financial sophistication
  • Credit worthiness
  • Personal responsibility
  • A capability to meet credit obligations

While the focus of the media and politicians is on doing the impossible, the real problem goes unsolved thereby becoming more ominous with each passing day.

The mortgage and real estate industry cannot exist without a fine tuned and efficiently running mortgage securitization machine. The machine is broken and no one is doing anything about it. They aren’t even talking about it.

Until integrity, confidence and efficiency is restored to the mortgage securitization process, the crisis will continue grow. There no way the industry can survive without it and every effort must be made in order to save it. Every American’s economic well being depends on it.

CT Governor Rell Allots $50 Million To Aid Subprime Borrowers

The details are rather murky. The State of Connecticut has set aside $50 million to aid subprime borrowers having difficulty making their mortgage payments.

Rell said the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority will create the $50 million CT Families fund to refinance subprime loans for those who qualify. The money comes from previously issued bonds.

Subprime loans are those given to borrowers who are considered a higher credit risk than people with perfect or near-perfect credit scores. During the recent real estate boom, many of these subprime borrowers were given mortgages with low introductory interest rates for the first two years that reset to higher rates in later years. They often were offered these loans with assurances that they could be refinanced because the home’s value would rise.

A large number of people are defaulting on these loans because housing prices have declined, pushing some home values below the outstanding mortgage.

I find several things disturbing with the above paragraph. First there is the phrase “for those who qualify“. If these people could qualify for another loan, there would be no need to set up this fund. The qualification details are still in the works and have not been released.

However, in order to help these people, people who arguably shouldn’t have been given loans in the first place, Connecticut Housing Finance Authority underwriting guidelines will need to be liberalized. They will need to be liberalized to an extent that is even more liberal than the mortgage loans that put these home owners in jeopardy to begin with.

Not even subprime lenders would grant loans to people whose collateral is insufficient to cover the full amount of the loans. Yet this press release will have you believe that is what CHFA is planning on doing.

So lets take a well performing group of loans (traditional CHFA loans) and mix in $50 million in mortgages that are more liberally underwritten than the loans that are causing the real estate and mortgage meltdown in the first place. This is exactly what happens when those in government who are clueless about an industry, come in to fix an ill perceived problem.

I also resent the demonization of mortgage originators which is accomplished through the sentence “They often were offered these loans with assurances that they could be refinanced because the home’s value would rise.

I’ve been in this business since 1991. I have seen shady dealings in this industry some serious and some not so. However, I have never seen future real estate value guarantees made by any savvy originator. That is not the purview of an originator.

Real Estate values, past present and future, are in the realm of the Real Estate Agent. If future value guarantees are being made, I would think it is the Real Estate Agent making them and not the originator.

Even if mortgage people did make representations to the like, it would have the same weight as your plummer telling you that you should have that mole looked at before it turns cancerous. Thanks for the concern, but I get my medical advice from medical professionals.

To support my statement that government really doesn’t understand this problem and thus are ill equipped to deal with it, lets examine the last sentence in the block quote above.

A large number of people are defaulting on these loans because housing prices have declined, pushing some home values below the outstanding mortgage.

Historically, real estate values have risen and declined without any effect on a home owner’s ability to repay their mortgage. The underlying real estate value has nothing to do with a home owner’s capacity to repay a loan. Repayment capacity is based solely on the cash flow attributes of the home owner not the value of the real estate.

The value of the real estate can effect the home owner’s ability to refinance. This is especially true when the value of the home declines to a lower level than the amount of the mortgage, which is the case for many home owners nationally.

The large number of mortgage defaults are a result of borrowers not having to prove their capacity to repay the loans (no income, no ratio and no doc loans) and the fact that many of these loans are adjusting their rates and payments upward. Again, declining real estate values have little to do with the mechanics of home owners defaulting.

As for these loans adjusting upwards, there is little excuse for the home owner not to know it was a realistic possibility. Before, during and after a mortgage transaction, the borrower is provided a “Truth In Lending” disclosure which clearly illustrates the possible stream of future payments (note item 11 on the example disclosre “Your payment schedule will be…). In other words, borrowers had the possibility of higher payments disclosed to them several times prior to closing their loan.

The subprime debacle is in essence a microcosm of what is wrong with our society today.

  • There is no personal responsibility for one’s actions, someone else is always to blame
  • Government is the panacea for all of society’s ills
  • The belief that personal responsibility and intelligence can be legislated

While well intentioned and being wonderful pubic relation releases for politicians, initiatives such as this one being undertaken by Connecticut, miss the mark in solving the problems at hand. Sometimes, many times, government cannot fix problems in question. When the government tries to, they often make the problems worse.

This may be one of those times as it can be argued that by bailing out home owners who got themselves in trouble with liberal mortgage loans by giving them yet another liberal mortgage loan is basically institutionalizing the subprime practices that are being blamed for the meltdown in the first place.

As the saying goes, “the road to hell is paved with good intentions”. Here are the details on the Connecticut subprime mortgage bailout initiative.

Foreclosure Bailout Loans Gone

Foreclosures accelerate while foreclosure bailout loans disappear.Just when the United States is faced with foreclosure epidemic, the very products used in the past to help people in foreclosure have disappeared.

My company was heavily involved in the foreclosure niche. We used to be able to refinance certain borrowers who faced foreclosure. In essence giving them a second or third chance to right their situation.

Before the mortgage meltdown of the summer of 2007, we routinely provided foreclosure bailout loans with loan to values of up to seventy percent of the foreclosed home’s appraised value. With Wall Street’s refusal to buy subprime mortgage paper, these products no longer exist.

The only products that are available to bail people out of foreclosure are private money lenders. The vast majority of private money lenders never lend up to seventy percent of the appraised value. This leaves a tremendous market void for a huge and rapidly growing number of distressed home owners.

How big a void? Let’s take a look at some Connecticut housing statistics highlighted in a Newsday article.

California-based RealtyTrac said the number of foreclosures increased 547 percent in the New Haven-Milford area, 522 percent in the Bridgeport-Norwalk-Stamford region and 446 percent in the Hartford area in the first half of this year, compared with the same period in 2006.

The absence of institutional foreclosure bailout money leaves us only with private money lenders. Private money lenders rarely lend in excess of sixty five percent of the appraised value of a foreclosed home. In many instances, they prefer to stay at around sixty percent of appraised value.

Add to this a real estate market that is experiencing historic declines in value, and you have virtually no market for the foreclosure bailout loan. Even if a private lender were interested in bailing out a home owner, the likelihood of the loan closing is greatly diminished by these real estate price declines.

It’s a double whammy. The industry, for all intents and purposes, has eliminated the foreclosure bailout loan and the avenues left to fill that void are impacted by the precipitous real estate value declines.

It’s obvious that this scenario negatively impacts those currently in foreclosure. What isn’t so obvious is that the foreclosure environment directly and negatively impacts home owners who are paying their mortgages on time and who enjoy the highest of credit ratings.

Foreclosures impact all home owners. When a foreclosed property is re-sold at a depressed price, it affects the values of all properties. Consequently, high grade borrowers are experiencing first hand, major declines in their home’s value.

Barney Frank Set to Throw Gas on Mortgage Meltdown Fire

U.S. Representative Barney Frank (D-Mass) is proposing legislation that will decimate the mortgage industry. If he is successful, it will no doubt negatively impact millions of Americans who own homes and who plan on buying homes. The public will see their mortgage choices cut in half, if not more, and has the potential of exacerbating the current mortgage and real estate crisis. Consider the excerpt from an October 29th bizjournals article

The bill, introduced by House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank, would require all mortgage originators to be licensed. It also would require lenders to determine that borrowers have a reasonable chance to repay the loan and ban incentives for mortgage originators to make certain types of loans.

First let me address the obvious. Originators and mortgage companies are already required to be licensed. They are required by the states that they operate in. Requiring Federal licensing will only add another layer of red tape to an industry already plagued with it.

He then wants mortgage companies to ensure a borrowers ability to repay a given loan. Only God can do that. There is no way any money making entity would take the risk of originating loans if they can be called to the carpet for not foreseeing a borrower not being able to repay. Yet that is what Barney Frank is requiring of mortgage companies.

The incentives he wants to ban are an integral part of mortgage pricing. The incentives he speaks of is called Yield Spread Premium in the mortgage industry. Originators get paid for providing a mortgage through front end fees or points and yield spread premium. Sometimes it’s one or the other and sometimes compensation comes from a combination of both.

Yield spread premiums provide compensation to the originator in exchange for delivering a mortgage with a rate that is higher than the “par” rate on any given day. The par rate is the rate that the originator can offer without yield spread premium being paid or without cost to the originator and or borrower.

It is through yield spread premium that no point and no cost mortgages are offered. When a lending institution offers a no point loan, they aren’t doing it for free. Someone is paying and that someone is the secondary market. The consumer benefits because they are able to get a loan without having to pay points. Eliminating yield spread premium would eliminate no point and no cost mortgages. How can this benefit the consumer?

The American Bankers Association also is concerned the bill would increase the regulatory burden for banks and restrict their “ability to provide products and services — all of which would increase costs and decrease choices for consumers,” said Floyd Stoner, the association’s executive director of congressional relations and public policy.

The National Association of Mortgage Brokers contended consumers would be hurt by the legislation’s elimination of the yield spread premium, a rebate paid to brokers if borrowers accept a higher interest rate in return for lower fees on the loan.

It is interesting to note that none of the measures in Frank’s legislation would have headed off the current mortgage crisis. However it is plain for everyone to see that the current crisis sets a nice stage for his grand standing.

Not only would his legislation not prevent the crisis, it will make the current crisis more painful and has the potential of thrusting this country into a 1930’s style depression by drying up liquidity in the mortgage market. This will lead to fewer homes being sold and more homes going into foreclosure. All of which will continue the steep downward spiral of housing prices.

Let’s remember one thing about politicians. Their number one goal is not help anyone in particular, but to get re-elected. Many are re-elected on ideas that sound good but are harmful in reality. This is one of those instances.